Some movies become classics because they win awards. Others become classics because people keep rewatching them years after they leave theaters.
How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days belongs firmly in the second category.
The 2003 romantic comedy starring Kate Hudson and Matthew McConaughey has remained one of those movies that keeps finding new audiences through streaming, television reruns and endless internet references.
Now, more than two decades after Andie Anderson and Benjamin Barry first tried to outsmart each other in the name of love, their story may be getting another chapter.
A sequel to How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days is officially in development, with Hudson attached to produce. According to Variety, the project is still in its early stages and is currently looking for a screenwriter. The filmmakers’ intention is reportedly for Hudson and McConaughey to return as Andie and Ben.
For rom-com fans, that is already enough reason to start paying attention.
Wait, what happened to Andie and Ben?
The original film followed Andie Anderson, a magazine writer who takes on a challenge to write about the classic mistakes that can drive a man away. At the same time, advertising executive Benjamin Barry makes a bet of his own: he believes he can make a woman fall in love with him within 10 days.

Andie Anderson and Benjamin Barry
Neither knows what the other is trying to accomplish.
Naturally, everything goes spectacularly wrong.
What follows is a series of increasingly ridiculous dating experiments, from Andie’s deliberately clingy behavior to Benjamin’s attempts to prove that their relationship is genuine. Somewhere between the games, arguments and schemes, however, the two actually fall for each other.
And that is what made the movie work.
Beneath all the chaos was a surprisingly simple romantic-comedy question: What happens when two people who are pretending not to care start actually caring?
Yellow dress still one of the most iconic rom-com looks
And, of course, there is the dress.
Few rom-com fashion moments are as instantly recognizable as the yellow gown Hudson wears during the couple’s glamorous evening together. The look became one of the defining images of the movie and remains part of the film’s visual identity more than 20 years later.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(749x0:751x2)/kate-hudson-how-to-lose-a-guy-in-10-days-082426-1493102af2144e3cb9e6c802a3f5e7e9.jpg)
Andie Anderson in a yellow dress
But the appeal of How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days was never just about fashion.
The movie captured a particular kind of early-2000s romantic fantasy: glamorous New York offices, magazine careers, elaborate apartments, formal dinners, grand gestures and two attractive people who somehow keep running into each other’s emotional traps.
It was ridiculous.
It was charming.
And audiences loved it.
Why the sequel makes sense now
Hollywood has been revisiting older properties for years, but the renewed interest in How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days feels particularly appropriate.
Rom-coms have experienced something of a revival among younger audiences, helped by streaming platforms and social media. Movies that were once dismissed as comfort entertainment are now regularly rediscovered, quoted and turned into memes.
For younger viewers, the original film can feel like a time capsule of dating before dating apps completely transformed the experience.
There are no carefully curated dating profiles.
No “left on read.”
No situationships defined through Instagram stories.
No swiping.
And certainly no algorithm deciding who might be your next romantic disaster.
Andie and Ben’s dating problems may have been exaggerated, but the underlying idea remains familiar: people sometimes enter relationships while hiding what they actually want.
But a sequel has a lot to live up to
Nostalgia is powerful, but it can also be dangerous.
A sequel cannot simply recreate the yellow dress, the New York skyline and the early-2000s soundtrack and expect audiences to feel exactly the same way.
More than 20 years have passed.

Andie and Ben, kissing
Andie and Ben, if they return, are no longer young professionals trying to win a bet. They would presumably be older, with an entirely different set of experiences and problems.
That could actually make the sequel more interesting.
Instead of repeating the original plot, the new film could explore what happens after the romantic-comedy ending.
What does happily ever after look like when the couple has been together for two decades?
Do they still argue the same way?
Are they still competitive?
What happens when careers, family, marriage and adulthood replace the excitement of a new relationship?
There is plenty of material there.
Please don’t just remake the first movie
The worst thing the sequel could do is simply repeat the original.
Another bet.
Another dating challenge.
Another series of increasingly ridiculous misunderstandings.

Another couple pretending not to fall in love.
That might technically give audiences what they remember, but it would miss an opportunity.
The sequel should understand why people still love Andie and Ben while allowing them to exist in the present.
Andie was a career-focused magazine writer at a time when female characters in romantic comedies were often expected to eventually choose between professional ambition and romance. Bringing her back today could offer an opportunity to explore how her career, relationships and understanding of herself have evolved.
Benjamin, meanwhile, could also be more than the charming advertising executive audiences remember.
The characters have aged.
The world has aged.
The sequel should, too.
What about Kate Hudson and Matthew McConaughey?
This is the question everyone will be asking.
Will Hudson and McConaughey actually return?

At the moment, the reported intention is for them to reprise their roles, but the project remains in development, so audiences should not treat their return as a completely finalized deal.
Still, having Hudson involved as a producer makes the possibility particularly exciting.
Hudson has spoken fondly of the movie over the years, and the chemistry between her and McConaughey was one of the original film’s biggest strengths.
That chemistry is difficult to manufacture.
A new pair of actors could play Andie and Ben, but there would always be comparisons.
If the sequel can bring back the original stars, it would immediately have something most legacy rom-com sequels struggle to recreate: the actual people audiences fell in love with the first time.
The real challenge is making it feel like 2026
Dating has changed dramatically since 2003.
A modern sequel would have to acknowledge that.
Imagine Andie trying to write a dating article in an era of dating apps, ghosting, viral relationship advice and influencers documenting their relationships online. Benjamin’s advertising career would also look completely different in a world where social media algorithms and digital campaigns dominate marketing.

There is even a fun possibility of making the original film’s central premise completely impossible today.
Andie’s magazine assignment would not simply be about how to lose a guy.
It could become an experiment in how modern dating has changed, with the couple navigating dating apps, online personas and the pressure to perform relationships publicly.
The comedy almost writes itself.
Why fans are already excited
For longtime fans, however, the appeal is simpler.
They want to see Andie and Ben again.

There is something comforting about returning to characters from a movie that many people watched during a different stage of their lives. A sequel offers the possibility of reconnecting with a story that once represented the ultimate romantic fantasy.
For younger viewers discovering the original today, it could also become an introduction to the classic studio rom-coms that defined an earlier era of Hollywood.
And that may be the most interesting thing about this project.
It is not just a sequel.
It is a conversation between two generations of rom-com fans.
The rom-com we deserve, or the one we remember?
There is a difference between wanting a movie to return and actually needing a sequel.
How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days already has a perfectly satisfying ending. Andie and Ben figure out the truth behind their games, admit their feelings and choose each other.
There is no obvious loose end demanding another film.
But maybe that is exactly why a sequel could be fun.
It does not need to fix the original.
It simply needs to give audiences a new reason to spend time with these characters.
If Hudson and McConaughey return, the movie would have the nostalgia factor. If the filmmakers can also give Andie and Ben a genuinely fresh story, it could become more than another Hollywood attempt to cash in on an old favorite.
So, should rom-com fans be excited?
Absolutely, but with realistic expectations.

The sequel is still in the early stages, and there is no confirmed release date or finalized story yet. A screenwriter is still being sought, meaning many of the details fans are already speculating about could change.
For now, the best thing to do is enjoy the possibility.
Because somewhere out there, Andie Anderson may be getting another magazine assignment, Benjamin Barry may be preparing another ridiculous bet, and an entire generation of rom-com fans is preparing to ask the most important question:
Can a movie made in 2003 still make us believe in happily ever after in 2026?
We might soon find out.